Feb 06, 2007, 05:14 PM // 17:14
|
#21
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Guild: Great Indigo Laughing Dragon
Profession: R/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BahamutKaiser
If you keep trying to justify a cross between exsisting skills your never going to make anything useful. Any class is going to share some of the same roles as exsisting classes, but they need to do it in an original manner.
Don't try to cross classes, try to make an original alternative to an exsisting class or class combination. What's a Dervish a Cross Between? An elementist and a warrior? but he does damage to multple foes with his attack, and does AoE damage enchantments which deal additional effects when removed, and involves intentional removal of his own enchantments with the benifit of additional effects and restoritive bonuses.
Start with something we have, mix it around a bit, make an original way for it to accomplish a goal, and than give it some flavor. I can make a cross between a mesmer and a monk..... with a Mesmer/Monk, or a Monk/Mesmer. And nothing you suggested makes it any more original than one of those combinations and a few new skills added to the exsisting classes instead of making a totally new class with absolutely nothing to offer or diversify the game.
|
Hmm..., so I should just give it up?
You're probably right.
|
|
|